The Russian army left thousands of corpses of civilians after the retreat

After the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Kiev region of Ukraine and the liberation of these territories by the forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, about 1000 corpses of civilians who died a violent death in the cities of Bucha, Irpen, Gostomel and adjacent territories were discovered.

x

Cases of mass graves of civilians, traces of torture and rape of women were noted.

Aleksey Arestovich, adviser to the President of Ukraine Zelensky, made a statement that in the cities of Bucha, Irpen and Gostomel, the bodies of civilians were found against whom violence was used. Some corpses had their hands tied, some corpses have traces of shots in the back of the head.

480 corpses of civilians were taken out from Bucha alone. 410 bodies of civilians were found in Irpen. (according to information at the time of publication on April 3-4, more accurate data will probably be later).

The Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine opened a criminal case on the facts of the violent death of citizens of Ukraine.

The mayor of Irpin, Alexander Markushin, in an interview with Deutsche Welle, said that the Russian military gathered women and girls, shot them and crushed the corpses with tanks.

Mikhail Podolyak, a participant in negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, wrote on Telegram:

After all, according to our European partners, the main thing is not to provoke the Russians? (evil irony). The main thing is that the Third World War does not start? The main thing is that the Russians do not get offended and do not use … What did they not use? Missiles, air bombs, tanks, did not massacre civilians, bombard residential areas, mass executions, as in concentration camps? What haven’t they used yet?

As a result, the world received a total indescribable horror of anti-humanity in Bucha, Irpin, Gostomel. Hundreds, thousands of killed, torn to pieces, raped, bound, raped again and killed again. Hundreds, thousands of peaceful Ukrainian citizens. Killed with special brutality.

The Russian side has not yet reacted in any way to the publication of evidence of war crimes by the Russian army.

UPD: Russia demanded to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council on Monday, April 4, “in connection with the provocation of Ukrainian radicals in Bucha.”

UPD 2: Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov called the video from Buchi a fake (rus).

109992, Kitajgorodskij pr., d.7, str.2, Moscow, Russia +74959833393

03.04.2022

14 Comments

  1. A big mistake for any weak nation being attacked is to pray and hope for help from the Western Cucks / Euro-pee-ons. Russia isn’t what it’s cracked up to be, but NATO is far from the “world police” people view them as. Bunch of cowardly eunuchs. Bombing shit Middle Eastern countries with no AA is one thing, direct conflict with a modern military is something completely different. Nuclear arsenals aside, if Russia is viewed as such a supervillain, what would these eunuchs do if China got all trigger happy? The soft faggy West would shit themselves before commiting suicide. They’re all getting fat eating shit GMO food hosting their little Super Bowls and Oktoberfests, completely disconnected and sheltered from the harsh reality of life.

    1. Author

      What is happening in Ukrainian cities is genocide and war crimes. Russia must be stopped.
      There is no doubt that NATO will avoid confrontation with Russia to the last. But we remember what happens when toothless Western democracy hesitates. First the annexation of Czechoslovakia, then the annexation of Austria, then the attack on Poland and France.
      Do you understand what I am talking about?
      The West, in the person of Putin, raised a new Hitler.
      It seems that Churchill said: “Munich: the choice between war and shame. I think that in the next few weeks we will have to choose between war and shame, and I have little doubt what the solution will be”
      After that, the West received both war and shame.

      1. I agree with everything you said.
        If the West treated evil as evil, and not as Nazi and non-Nazi, we’d get somewhere. They firebombed and raped civilians, and even nuked Germany’s ally’s Japan civilians twice, but Russians have no swastika on their uniform, so it’s all good. It’s only a warcrime when you have a swastika on your uniform.

        1. Author

          Does the presence of a swastika on the sleeve define fascism? What is happening now in Russia is fascism. I’ll tell you a secret: if you take Umberto Eco’s definition of fascism, then Russia passes through 12 out of 14 signs of fascism.
          You don’t know what they are talking about in Russian social networks.
          And they say, “yes, great, let’s destroy Ukraine, let’s kill all Ukrainians.”
          At the moment, Russia is evil in its purest form, what propaganda did to the Russians is approximately what Hitler did to the Germans in 1939.

          1. A swastika on the sleeve doesn’t define fascism, it was a sarcastic remark, a mockery of the type of subconscious reasoning prevalent in the West. We agree on most points. That foaming at the mouth calling for genocide of your neighbor can also be seen in the Balkan wars, specifically the Serbians and Bosnian people, but also the Croats. It was a very bloody triangle of hate between the three.
            Slavs really have a knack for ethno-religous neighbor wars.
            Interestingly you attribute this hateful thinking more than less to propaganda? I don’t know what the media goes on about in Russia day-to-day but I’m sure there’s some sort of Casus belli, latin for justification of war. Some sort of claim to territory. Thing is, even without those reasons, I think Russians and Ukrainians would still hate each other. They’d make some shit up to satisfy their blood lust. It just seems like an Eastern European / Slavic thing to me.

          2. Author

            Over the past 20 years, propaganda has been carried out in Russia about the chosenness of Russians. There were even statements about the so-called. “Russian chromosome”. The West is our enemy, the USA is our enemy and only we, the Russian “warriors of light”. It is we who defeated fascism, it is we Russians who have a morality that the West does not have.
            Russia has “its own way”, and the West cannot tell us what to do.

            It was Ukraine that was preparing to attack Russia, it was Ukraine that was developing biological weapons on US orders. Power in Ukraine was seized by neo-Nazis and drug addicts, and we are going to liberate the Ukrainian people.
            Something like this -)

            Until 2014, when Putin occupied Crimea and Donbass, neither Russians nor Ukrainians had enmity towards each other. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians lived and worked in Russia, millions of Russians traveled to resorts in Ukraine. The Ukrainians were against joining NATO, we were not enemies.

            In 2014, everything changed and suddenly the Ukrainians became our enemies. That’s what the propaganda says.

            Russia has fought evil for too long and has become an absolute evil itself. It’s like looking into the abyss, which will look to you.

          3. Author

            Here is the publication of April 3 in RIA Novosti and a few quotes from it. What is this, if not frenzied fascist propaganda:

            However, in addition to the top [of Ukraine], a significant part of the masses of the people, which are passive Nazis, accomplices of Nazism, are also guilty.

            Further denazification of this mass of the population consists in re-education, which is achieved by ideological repression (suppression) of Nazi attitudes and strict censorship: not only in the political sphere, but also necessarily in the sphere of culture and education.

            Denazification will inevitably also be a de-Ukrainization – a rejection of the large-scale artificial inflation of the ethnic component of self-identification of the population of the territories of historical Little Russia and New Russia, begun by the Soviet authorities.

            Ukrainism is an artificial anti-Russian construction that does not have its own civilizational content, a subordinate element of an alien and alien civilization.

            Russia did everything possible to save the West in the 20th century. She implemented the main Western project, an alternative to capitalism, which won the nation-states – the socialist, red project. It crushed German Nazism, a monstrous product of the crisis of Western civilization. The last act of Russian altruism was the outstretched hand of friendship from Russia, for which Russia received a monstrous blow in the 1990s.

            Link (rus)

          4. A way to bypass people’s resistance to killing and murder is to dehumanize the enemy and paint him as someone who has done grave sins and is deserving of elimination. Even then people find it hard to personally pull the trigger because killing someone isn’t like stepping on ants. Usually the aggressor party suffers long lasting mental trauma from basically forcing themselves through the war, ignoring your conscious for years and killing and killing and possibly raping people, rationalizing away the doubts and laughing about it so as to turn it into one big joke not worthy of seriously thinking about. There’s an American (anti)-war song called “Napalm sticks to kids” where the atrocities in the Vietnam war are detailed, and at the end the singer/soldier lets out a maniacal laugh while dying inside because that’s all he can do at that point. It’s a dark and surreal reality. This is why the defending party that is defending their home from invasion finds it much easier to kill and fight, because they have no choice and are fighting a just war, they don’t really suffer from PTSD that much.
            That’s where propaganda as you shown comes in to kickstart people’s motivation to kill.
            What’s interesting is, when the average Russian reads the above excerpts, does he think: “Yeah, upon close inspection, I totally agree with everything”? or does he think: “This all seems like a stretch, making a mountain out of an ant hill, but I’m going to surpress any critical thought and join everyone else in this mass hysteria and echo-chamber because, fuck morals, practicality and pragmatism is what matters. Let’s go to war. “?

            Also, let me ask you, how many people support the war, and how many think like you? Ironically, you mentioned Interpol and FBI has no legal jurisdiction to request the website back-end but if anyone is going to scare you into submission, it will be the FSB, and not Interpol? lol.
            I mean, how can you denounce Russia’s politics and call Putin a maniacal tyrant and still exist? What do you think of all this?

          5. Author

            I have heard this mantra many times that it is very difficult to kill a person. But I would like to ask the authors of this postulate – is it difficult to kill if your life is in danger? Or is it difficult to kill if you know that you will not be held responsible for the murder? This theory was put forward by people who have never taken up arms in their lives.

            I don’t know what average Russians think about this article. I sent several friends a link to the article, but have not yet received a response.

            It is difficult to say how many Russians support the war. Propaganda says that 70-80% are for the war, but an independent poll shows that 53% of Russians consider Russia to be an aggressor country.

            Unconditional real support for Putin is 34-35% (don’t ask how he became president). I believe that at least 30% of Russians support the war.
            Propaganda works in such a way to show everyone “hey, look, geeks, the people are for Putin.” But of course this is not the case.

            Our project has existed since 2003. During this time, many different events took place. Certain measures have been taken against the FSB and the police. I can’t talk about it publicly, but if something happens, these organizations are in for a few nasty surprises.

          6. Well, I think in wartime, killing a civilian as a soldier is hard. I think killing a soldier as a soldier is easier if you have a just cause. Killing when it’s morally justified in general is easier. For the average person at least. Killing someone willy-nilly like i.e. Dnepropetrovsk maniacs did that homeless guy would be way harder on the average person, unless they were a little out there mentally like the said guys. People who believe in God and the afterlife I think also have a harder time killing. You figuratively have the fear of God in ya and are worried if your killing is justified.
            Atheists probably find it easier because of no fear of Divine retribution in the afterlife, since they don’t believe in it. So you’re right, killing is easy if you know you won’t be held responsible for it; in this life and the next. I should have been more clear in the previous comment.

            We’ll see how the war plays out and hopefully it doesn’t come to nukes

  2. what goes around comes around even if it takes 80yrs in 1941 the ukrainians willingly and gleefully killed ukrainian jews like in the LVIV pogrom the odessa pogrom and in KYIV babi yar where ukrainian policemen and nationalists rounded up and helped kill the jews, now they are getting their just deserts 80 yrs later, its sort of intergenerational KARMA i call it ,lol

    1. Author

      Why then does your ‘karma’ not punish the Belarusians? Or are you not aware of the history of the Minsk ghetto? I can also remind you about the army of General Vlasov, who fought against the USSR on the side of Germany. Or Russians who served in the SS troops in Latvia.

    2. Someone killed jews? Thanks for brightening up my day. I love killing jews

  3. boohoo fucking ruski shit. dead russian is best russian. i hope biden nuke that shit country to fucking fallout zone.
    everything what rustards touch turns into pure SHIT!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *